“Congestion pricing is just one of many tools that will help tame some of the city street chaos a generation of car-centric planning left us with. And one of the primary benefactors of congestion pricing will be automobile drivers themselves.”
Hundreds of supporters and critics of the city’s proposed congestion pricing tolling plan sounded off at a final public hearing with MTA officials on March 4 in lower Manhattan.
Among the critics was New Jersey Gov. Phil Murphy, who phoned in a claim that congestion pricing was not about congestion or the environment, but instead a means to solve the MTA’s deficit. The toll would be “backbreaking” for New Jersey commuters and would displace pollution from Manhattan to parts of New Jersey, the governor said.
Displace pollution from Manhattan to New Jersey? Cry me a carbon-free river.
Three to four days each week, I commute from Brooklyn to my job in lower Manhattan by bicycle. The route to the Brooklyn bridge takes me north from where I live in Carroll Gardens along a narrow, unprotected bike lane on Clinton Street to downtown Brooklyn and the entrance onto the bridge’s two-way bike path, which by the way, is right next to the car lanes headed into Manhattan. Along the way, I pass what seems like hundreds of cars, most of them oversized SUVs, inching slowly along like a crowded herd of angry hippos.
More than 90 percent of the time, the number of individuals inside those cars, both big and small, is just one. I’d wager the same is true for the scores of private cars heading in from New Jersey and beyond.
This being New York City, the demand for real estate will always outweigh supply—and that includes space on our city streets, which in Manhattan’s case, are filled to capacity with big, loud, carbon-belching automobiles. Considering the toll they take on the rest of us, automobile drivers have been getting an absurdly generous deal for that valuable space.
Streets are our largest public spaces. Yet, with 19,000 lane miles and three million street parking spots, New York City surrenders an astonishing amount of these precious public assets to automobiles, free of charge. Our streets should be valued by imposing monetary costs on the automobile drivers who crowd onto them each day.
Like the majority of city residents, I don’t have a car. I’ve not owned a car since I moved to New York City from the car-loving deep south more than three decades ago. I never really wanted the burden of owning, driving and storing a car. Besides that, I’ve always been a bicycling or public transit commuter.
New Yorkers own fewer than a third as many cars per capita as the average U.S. urban resident (about 23 per 100 residents compared to about 77 per 100 in most urban areas). Across the five boroughs, around 45 percent of residents own a car but only a fraction of those individuals commute by car to work in Manhattan each day. The Traffic Mobility Review Board has said 150,000 people travel by car into Manhattan for work, while nearly 1 million take public transit.
And that makes Gov. Murphy’s whining about the burdens a tolling system will place on a tiny yet very vocal group of New Jersey drivers all the more grating.
In addition to our city tax dollars paying for the constant repairs to damage done to our infrastructure caused by congestion, we should also call out the mental and physical health toll automobiles wreak on pedestrians, cyclists and city residents.
Cars rattle our nerves and they inflict bone crushing, life changing and crippling injuries upon thousands of New Yorkers each year. Cars kill cats, birds and dogs. More heartbreaking, we lost nearly 100 pedestrians to auto violence in 2023 and a record number of cyclists were killed by drivers as well. Vision Zero is still just a vision today because of irresponsible and often entitled automobile drivers.
That sense of entitlement has its roots in the decades of destructive, car-centric urban planning from the likes of highway-happy power broker Robert Moses, who for all his accomplishments was inexcusably hostile to public transportation. It’s through no fault of our own, that no matter what part of the United States we come from, we’re conditioned early on to believe streets and roads were created solely for the automobile’s use.
Congestion pricing is just one of many tools that will help tame some of the city street chaos a generation of car-centric planning left us with. And, one of the primary benefactors of congestion pricing will be automobile drivers themselves.
In 10 years, New Yorkers will probably look back on the days of toll-free driving in Manhattan’s central business district—and, hopefully someday too, at the absurdity of free on street parking—with bemusement.
Congestion pricing is a step forward into the sort of city I want to live in; a city with an even more extensive, fast moving and reliable transit system, a city where riding a bicycle or other micro-mobility device is not only safe, but seen as the norm.
I also want to live in a city where pedestrians don’t have to spend so much time worrying about dodging aggressive drivers, who are understandably angry after being stuck in Manhattan congestion for hours at a time.
Cody Lyon is a former journalist and a Manhattan Community Board 1 member.
7 thoughts on “Opinion: Congestion Pricing is a Step Forward for NYC”
Call it what it really is: suicidal, strangulation pricing.
We will be replacing the healthy congestion
that is the hallmark of a bustling-growing-thriving-open&inviting city
with the slow strangulation & self-suicide of a closed & dying city,
This, as our commerce, our entertainment options,
our very freedom of movement ….is strangled.
Congestion pricing is the very embodiment
of the mindless MAGA mantra of building walls,
as we balkanize & divide & destroy this city…..
Dear Mr. Lyon,
I am a 4th generation New Yorker – don’t even know how to drive.
My family walks and uses bus and subway.
And am completely against Congestion Pricing.
There are so many reasons it is doubtful that City Limits would allow me the space.
But to note just a few issues:
The stated purpose of CP is for revenue for the MTA for capital – CP will not reduce fares. and CP will not help bus service which the MTA keeps cutting.
There are many non-rich people who drive (it particularly concerns me that a Alabama transplant feels entitled to pass judgement here) – for example, they live far away without access to reliable mass transit, may have night shifts etc.
Most vehicles are commercial – not personal.
The City continues to enable/allow/create more and new congestion including: shrinking street space, closing streets. adding bike lanes, unfettered luxury high rise development, unfettered Uber, explosion in Amazon/ecommerce and more.
CP will quicken the gentrification tsunami.
CP is not meant to further or justify bicycling.
Bicycling does not reduce vehicles. In fact, bicycling does siphon from bus and subway use.
NYC bicyclists routinely go through red lights, go the wrong way, ignore bike lanes and are overall egregious in their disregard for pedestrians
Relatives and friends have been hit by bicyclists – Citibike, racing bicyclists, food delivery workers.
As an authentic New Yorker, the last thing I want is ” a city where riding a bicycle or other micro-mobility device is not only safe, but seen as the norm”
There’s an old expression that goes something like, “please don’t pee on my head and tell me it’s raining”. That is the condition we find ourselves in now in NY. Our streets have been very poorly redesigned by a non-transparent autocratic DOT to greatly accommodate bike lanes used by a minority of New Yorkers, along with other things like Citibike platforms and Open Streets which actually closes streets. And everyone is wondering why the traffic is so bad? Hence the old expression.
If you cut down 4 lanes to 2 or even 1, traffic is going to be bad. If you bring in tens of thousands of for hire Lyfts and Ubers, traffic is going to be even worse! And then if you bring in 65,000 unregulated e-vehicle delivery guys it’s going to be pandemonium. Which is what we now have. And the solution? Charge people so there’s less bad traffic!
This is a situation foisted on the public without their ability to do anything at all about it! Protests, petitions, and cries at community boards and at City Hall fall on deaf ears. The public realm has been ceded to private companies so that even walking is an issue now. Perhaps the city and state will move to charge us to do that too.
As for other modes of transit, I for one no longer take the subway or taxis either. The subways are far too unsafe particularly since lithium-battery e-bikes ride on them blessed by the MTA. They are combustible as witnessed by many of us forced to live with them on our streets and in our buildings. It’s a matter of time til there is a deadly fire in the subway because of them. And while e-bikes were invited on by the MTA, some of the other problems perhaps were not. Daily there are incidents often by the mentally ill as well as plain ol’ criminals either pushing people onto the tracks or robbing them. No thanks. I’m done with the MTA and their sadly managed industry and poor judgment.
Another mode of transportation taxis have become far too expensive and even drivers will tell you that. And that’s before an increase for congestion pricing (even though there already is an increase for cp). It is now $10 just to get in a cab and go nowhere. So as a middle class New Yorker my options and my freedoms have become less and less while my taxes have sky-rocketed.
This is no longer a city for the working class, the middle class and the upper middle class and I can only construe from all of this that more and more of us will be pushed out of here. Unless you are in a rent-stabilized apartment you will find it very difficult to continue to pay the increased costs. Because surely when trucks and cars are forced to pay hefty fees, they will transfer those fees to you and me in the form of food, clothing and the things we require in order to live. It’s a deal breaker.
A livable city?? Not from where I sit. And I hardly think I’m alone.
No one disputes the need to build and maintain an effective public transit system serving 22.2 million residents in the largest and most economically significant metropolitan region in the United States with more than 10.7 million jobs. The focus must be (1) identifying equitable, fair and sustainable resources and (2) impacts of any resource plan.
By every measure this regressive, inequitable, unfair and unsustainable congestion toll-tax scheme fails on every level.
Despite its name it achieves nothing of any consequence with relieving congestion.
It even falls short of its claims concerning the environment; instead it negatively impacts public health.
Moreover, its implementation will increase everyday costs of goods and services for small businesses and all New Yorkers whether they take public transit, ride a bike, walk, rely on for hire vehicles or drive a car.
It remains the most inefficient and uncertain source of revenue.
The best path remains canning this toll-tax scheme and identifying other resources not reliant on any net revenue scheme.
This scheme remains the brainchild of some misguided folks who fixate on eliminating passenger cars in Manhattan, mostly south of 60th Street by imposing a tax on entry that effectively eliminates all but the uber-wealthy if this toll-tax scheme that requires a net revenue ultimately prevails. This congestion pricing scheme is nothing more than a handout to hedge fund-supported Uber and Lyft and its wealthiest riders at the expense of lower income and minority New Yorkers, many living in transit deserts.
Its misguided adoption during the 2019 state budget process involved funding massive borrowing to help someone – no longer in public office – become the second coming of Robert Moses.
Key Pints:
The MTA Failed to Consider Other, Better Sources of Funding
The Toll-Tax Scheme Fails to Protect Public Health & the Environment
Rather than Spur Growth, the Toll-Tax Can Kill the Economy
The Congestion Tax is a Regressive, Unfair & Inequitable Tax
It is a Non-Factor in Relieving Congestion
So we are left with a phony plan that irresponsibly uses falsehoods about congestion reduction and the environment to support a regressive, inequitable, unfair and unsustainable toll- tax.
The best path remains to acknowledge this plan fails on every level and to recommend what works.
Adding to my previous comment…
It continues to be incredible that affluent people who’ve moved to NYC from “suburban” or car dependent areas, people who’ve contributed to NYC gentrification, feel entitled to denounce vehicle users in NYC.
Conveniently, their older or ill relatives are back in the suburbs and get driven around.
Perhaps City Limits can reach out to Mr. Lyon and ask him to detail who cares for his older and ill relatives – and if that includes driving?
No – Congestion Pricing is not for bicycling.
City and State politicians and the MTA say congestion pricing will improve outer-borough transit so motorists can ditch their cars. But actions speak louder than words.
The Rockaway Beach Branch is an unused transit right of way and Queens’ only north-south rail corridor. It’s located between the infamously congested Woodhaven Boulevard and Van Wyck Expressway. Reactivating it for subway use is a huge opportunity to reconnect south Queens with the rest of the City and get motorists to ditch their cars for cleaner subways.
The MTA predicted 47,000 daily riders would enjoy reduced commuting time, and have better access to jobs, education, and recreation, essential for the disadvantaged families at the end of the line who need it most.
Instead, the MTA has done everything possible to prevent this capital project from ever happening. The Mayor has sold out to special interests who have decided that south Queens commuters should not have their rail line reconnected, but continue to take a 2-hour bus ride to and from central Queens and midtown Manhattan. To ensure there is no hope of ever reactivating this line, he has committed $35 million of City funds and $117 million in federal funds to build his skinny park. Keeping communities of color poor is not as cheap as it used to be.
The City and State will continue struggling to sell congestion pricing to outer borough commuters until they put our money where their mouth is.